Colorado District 4 Candidates Clash on Key Issues
Lauren Boebert and Eileen Laubacher disagree on taxes, Medicaid, and energy policy ahead of the general election.
By Aiko Petrov ·

Voters in Colorado’s 4th Congressional District face stark differences between the two major party candidates on taxes, healthcare, and energy. Rep. Lauren Boebert, the Republican incumbent, and Eileen Laubacher, the Democratic challenger, have outlined their positions on several major policy areas. The district stretches from the eastern plains to Douglas County and Loveland.
On tax policy, the two candidates offer opposite views regarding the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Laubacher supports making the tax breaks for tipped workers and overtime pay permanent. She also backs the child tax credit increase to $2,200 included in the bill, though she proposes raising it further. She wants to eliminate a tax benefit estimated at $70 billion for companies building data centers. Boebert wants to make all tax cuts in the bill permanent. She also seeks to lower capital gains taxes for senior homeowners and payroll taxes on tips. "People were very generous to my restaurant waiters, and many times, I ended up paying for it," Boebert said.
The candidates also disagree on Medicaid work requirements. Laubacher supports the concept but calls the paperwork excessive. She warned that some people will lose benefits while trying to comply. "I think it is designed that way for the government to save money, even if temporarily," Laubacher said. She believes states should manage these requirements. Boebert strongly supports the mandates. "We do not need physically able adults to stay home receiving benefits that should go to our most vulnerable populations," Boebert said. She noted that exceptions exist for single mothers and people with disabilities, and that volunteer work can count toward the requirement.
Rural hospitals are another point of contention. Laubacher argued that rural hospitals need more funding due to Medicaid cuts and low insurance payments. She cited a $50 billion Rural Health Care Transformation Program created by the bill. Colorado received $200 million in the first year of this program. Laubacher called the program "fundamentally flawed." Boebert does not believe hospitals need additional funding beyond the program. She blamed Colorado Democratic legislators for previous Medicaid cuts. Boebert described the $50 billion program as a "huge benefit" for rural facilities.
On water policy, both candidates support the Arkansas Valley Conduit project. Boebert is working to pass legislation funding the project after President Donald Trump vetoed it last year. The House approved the measure in September. It is now in the Senate, where Sen. Michael Bennet is working to secure passage. "We hope it becomes law," Boebert said. Laubacher agreed that the project is important for southeastern Colorado.
Energy views differ sharply on the path away from fossil fuels. Laubacher said Colorado is moving in the right direction toward renewables. However, she argued that battery storage technology has not advanced enough to rely solely on solar and wind. She proposed modernizing the grid and improving energy efficiency. Boebert believes the market should determine energy sources. She called electric vehicles a "big failure" and said the climate has always changed. Boebert supports using hydropower, fossil fuels, and nuclear energy to keep costs accessible.
Regarding public lands, Laubacher said federal payments from oil and gas companies should be reviewed regularly. "These are public lands and resources that belong to everyone. So when private companies profit from extracting them, taxpayers should receive fair compensation," she said. Boebert said the government collects enough through taxes and fees. She noted that these funds help local communities build schools and fire stations without raising local taxes.
On immigration, Laubacher said the U.S. needs a major reform of its migration system. She supports a path to permanent residency for working individuals who pay taxes, including those with pending asylum claims. She noted that people convicted of violent crimes should not stay. Boebert said the U.S. is already very generous on immigration. "If you are in our country illegally, you have to leave," Boebert said. She praised the Trump administration for enforcing laws and removing non-citizens who have committed crimes.
Foreign aid policy shows another split. Laubacher said taxpayer-funded military aid to Israel should end, though arms sales could continue case by case. "Israel has the capacity to pay for its own weapons for its defense," she said. Laubacher supports continuing military aid to Ukraine, citing the U.S. promise to protect Ukraine when it gave up nuclear weapons. Boebert said the U.S. should temporarily suspend aid to all countries. "It is not about a particular country. We have to put America first," Boebert said.
Source: The Colorado Sun





