Campaign Rhetoric: Analysts question the 'most fateful' label for Israel's October vote
Danny Kushmaro argues that branding the upcoming election as historically unique risks turning political disagreement into an existential crisis, making it harder for losers to accept the results.
By Harper Foster ·

The phrase has become a nightly refrain on Israeli television, with commentators describing the upcoming ballot as the most critical in the nation's history. Danny Kushmaro, who introduces the election segment on one major channel, uses the term 'most fateful elections' to frame the current contest. This language is not isolated to his program; it has permeated the broader campaign, with various figures labeling the October 2026 vote as the most important in Israel's past.
Kushmaro argues that this romanticization of the current moment is an unwise assumption. He suggests that every election feels fateful to those participating in it, but historical perspective is required to understand its true weight. By declaring this specific vote as superior to all predecessors, the political competition between the pro-Netanyahu and anti-Netanyahu blocs is elevated from a standard power struggle to an existential war. This framing implies that a defeat is not merely a setback to be corrected in the next cycle, but a catastrophe the country cannot survive.
The difficulty in accepting outcomes is a recurring theme in recent Israeli politics. Since Naftali Bennett formed his government in 2021, the nation has struggled with the fundamental question of whether the losing side will grant the winning side a chance to govern. Before the Bennett government was even sworn in, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu described its formation as 'the greatest election fraud.' Although Netanyahu meant broken campaign promises rather than stolen ballots, the message cast a legitimately formed government as fraudulent and illegitimate.
From the moment the Bennett government took office, the opposition worked to bring it down. The main arena for this struggle was the Knesset, where the coalition's slim majority made every vote consequential. In recordings published in May 2022, Likud MK Miri Regev defended voting against measures that benefited soldiers and vulnerable groups. She stated that the overriding objective was to topple the coalition, even if it meant opposing legislation the party generally supported. The government spent much of its short life fighting for survival.
When Netanyahu won the 2022 election and formed his hard-right government, the dynamic shifted. Yair Lapid conceded the election and arranged an orderly handover. However, as opposition to the judicial overhaul brought large crowds into the streets, the language of illegitimacy returned. In April 2023, former Shin Bet director Yuval Diskin addressed a massive demonstration in Tel Aviv. He stated that while the government had been elected legally, it was morally illegitimate due to its 'appalling composition and reprehensible actions.'
The 2026 election is scheduled for Tuesday. The campaign continues to frame the vote as a decisive moment for the nation's future. Analysts warn that this high-stakes narrative may complicate the post-election transition, as the losing bloc may view the result as an existential threat rather than a routine change in power. The debate over historical uniqueness remains central to the political discourse ahead of the ballot.
Source: The Jerusalem Post
More Politics · World news · Report a business · Got a Story?





